Mendepani Cabaran PBD: Analisis Hubungan Pengetahuan, Kemahiran, dan Sikap Guru

Pengarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.11

Kata kunci:

Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD); Tahap Penguasaan (TP); Pengetahuan Guru; Kemahiran Guru; Sikap Guru; Pendidikan Matematik; Sekolah Rendah

Abstrak

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara pengetahuan, kemahiran, dan sikap guru matematik sekolah rendah di Batu Pahat terhadap pemberian Tahap Penguasaan (TP) dalam Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD). PBD, sebagai alat penilaian formatif, telah diperkenalkan dalam sistem pendidikan Malaysia untuk menilai perkembangan murid secara berterusan tanpa tekanan peperiksaan tradisional. Walaupun PBD membawa potensi yang besar dalam meningkatkan kualiti pendidikan, pelaksanaannya menghadapi beberapa cabaran. Kajian terdahulu mendapati bahawa kekeliruan terhadap kriteria penilaian TP, kurangnya kemahiran dalam pelaksanaan PBD, serta sikap negatif guru, seperti anggapan beban tambahan, telah menghalang keberkesanan pentaksiran ini. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan kaedah soal selidik kepada sampel rawak berstrata guru-guru matematik sekolah rendah di Batu Pahat. Hasil kajian akan dianalisis menggunakan teknik statistik seperti analisis korelasi dan regresi berganda untuk menentukan kekuatan hubungan antara pengetahuan, kemahiran, dan sikap guru dalam pelaksanaan PBD. Dapatan kajian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan cadangan konkrit untuk meningkatkan tahap pemahaman dan kecekapan guru dalam melaksanakan PBD, seterusnya memperbaiki proses pembelajaran murid di Malaysia.

Rujukan

Ahmad, I., & Akbar, R. A. (2020). Examining relationship between self-efficacy beliefs of elementary level English

teachers and their implementation practices of formative assessment in Punjab. International Journal of

Education, 3(2), 123-134. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/51252

Ahmad, N., & Ismail, M. (2017). Impact of teacher attitudes on formative assessment implementation: A case study

in Malaysian schools. Malaysian Journal of Education, 34(2), 123-134.

https://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/article/view/20791

Ahmedi, V. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes and practices towards formative assessment in primary schools. Journal of

Social Studies Education Research, 10, 161-175. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1646

Boström, E., & Palm, T. (2023). The effect of a formative assessment practice on student achievement in

mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1101192

Cuizon, R. O., & Haider, A. (2019). Intervening effect of teacher-quality on the relationship between student

attitude and academic outcomes in mathematics. International Journal of Engineering and Future

Technology, 16, 43-51. https://www.ijeft.org

Gotch, C. M., Poppen, M. I., Razo, J. E., & Modderman, S. L. (2021). Examination of teacher formative assessment

self-efficacy development across a professional learning experience. Teacher Development, 25, 534-

https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1943503

Hwang, S., & Son, T. (2021). Students’ attitude toward mathematics and its relationship with mathematics

achievement. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(3), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.83.272.280

Ismail, I., & Zahari, R. (2018). Research progress on quantum memory. Journal of Quantum Information Science.

https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.6

Jamaludin, M. S., Ismail, Z., & Yusoff, R. (2019). Teacher assessment practices in formative assessment: Exploring

teachers' attitudes. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 45, 161-175.

https://www.pssc.org.ph/product-category/journal-issues/

Kültür, Y. Z., & Kutlu, M. (2021). The effect of formative assessment on high school students' mathematics

achievement and attitudes. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021474302

Matthews, J. S. (2020). Formative learning experiences of urban mathematics teachers and their role in classroom

care practices and student belonging. Urban Education, 55(4), 507-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919842625

Mohd Noor, S., & Saad, Z. (2020). Challenges in implementing formative assessment in primary schools. Journal of

Education and Social Sciences, 15(3), 85-102. https://jesoc.com/issues/

Pinger, P., Rakoczy, K., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2018). Interplay of formative assessment and instructional

quality—Interactive effects on students’ mathematics achievement. Learning Environments Research, 21, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9240-2

Ramollo, J. K., & Kanjee, A. (2023). Supporting teachers to develop formative assessment knowledge and skills in

no-fee schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 13(1), 1247. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1247

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., & Veldkamp, B. (2020). Formative assessment: A

systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Xiang, X., Yum, S., & Lian, R. (2023). Effect of cognitive attitude and affective attitude on formative assessment

practice: Intention as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.12484

research poster

Muat turun

Diterbitkan

2025-01-11

Cara Memetik

Ruslan, N. A. (2025). Mendepani Cabaran PBD: Analisis Hubungan Pengetahuan, Kemahiran, dan Sikap Guru. Journal of Research, Innovation, and Strategies for Education (RISE), 1(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.11