Digital Divide and Educational Inequality in Asia: A Cross-Country Secondary Data Analysis of Connectivity, Access, and Student Achievement

Mhel Cedric D. Bendo; Domar C.  Alviar

doi:10.70148/rise.v3i4.9

Authors

Mhel Cedric D. Bendo Polytechnic University of the Philippines–Maragondon Campus Author
Dr. Domar C. Alviar National University–Manila Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9078-2867

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.v3i4.9

Keywords:

Digital Divide, Educational Inequality, Student Achievement, Digital Connectivity, Rural Population

Abstract

The increasing reliance on digital technologies in education has intensified concerns regarding unequal access to digital resources across countries, particularly in developing regions. While digital connectivity has the potential to enhance learning opportunities, disparities in internet access and technological infrastructure may contribute to unequal educational outcomes. This study examines the relationship between the digital divide and educational inequality in Asia through a cross-country secondary data analysis of connectivity, access, and student achievement. Using publicly available datasets from the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the study analyzes key indicators of internet access, digital infrastructure, student achievement, and educational inequality across selected Asian countries. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression models were employed to examine structural associations among variables. The results indicate that internet access is positively associated with student achievement and negatively associated with educational inequality. Digital infrastructure also demonstrates positive associations with educational performance and lower levels of inequality. In contrast, rural population is negatively associated with student achievement and positively associated with educational inequality. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of digital connectivity and technological capacity in shaping both the quality and equity dimensions of education systems across diverse national contexts.

Author Biographies

Mhel Cedric D. Bendo, Polytechnic University of the Philippines–Maragondon Campus

Mhel Cedric D. Bendo is a student researcher and academic writer pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship at Polytechnic University of the Philippines–Maragondon Campus. His research interests include mobile learning, digital learning environments, AI in education, educational psychology, curriculum studies, educational assessment, and financial technology (FinTech). He serves on the editorial boards of the SIAR-Global Journal of Humanities, Management & Educational Review, SIAR-Global Journal of Literatures & Educational Review, the International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Exploration (IJMRE), and the International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA), and also works as a technical editor for an international academic journal. He is a reviewer for multiple international peer-reviewed journals, including Cogent Education (Taylor & Francis). He is an active researcher who has authored several studies published and forthcoming in international and Scopus-indexed journals, while his research-informed commentary has appeared in national and regional Philippine newspapers, including the Manila Bulletin.
Dr. Domar C. Alviar, National University–Manila

Domar C. Alviar is an Associate Professor at National University–Manila, where he is a 2026 Gawad Pantas awardee. He holds a Master of Development Communication and Doctor of Communication from the University of the Philippines Open University. A CHED-SIKAP scholar, his research interests include development communication, systems thinking, ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (EMCA), media ethics, law, and ethical artificial intelligence in education. He serves on the Steering Committee of the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) and contributes to academic discussions on academic integrity, higher education, and ethical AI. He previously worked in Middle East and North Africa customs relations and international supply management and served as publications and communications editor at Adamson University. He writes the “Inside Academe” column for Tutubi.ph and contributes opinion articles to national broadsheets, including the Philippine Daily Inquirer and other publications.

References

Alviar, D. C. (2023, August 2). Sapat ba ang teknolohiya upang epektibong magturo? Mga aral mula sa PIDS. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/news/in-the-news/sapat-ba-ang-teknolohiya-upang-epektibong-magturo-mga-aral-mula-sa-pids

Amin, C., Sigit, A. A., Saputra, A., Samson, M. G. M., & Sattar, F. (2026). Beyond access: Understanding digital platform adoption in Indonesia's informal economy. Digital Geography and Society, 10, 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2026.100162

Bakhtiar, H. A., Abu, R., & Shaifuddin, N. (2024). Sustainable collaboration between public libraries and school resource centers: Advancing digital information literacy in the digital age. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 14(2), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v14i2.4467

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students' online learning challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and how they cope with them. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo3684037.html

Bendo, M. C. D. (2026). Attention fragmentation in digital learning environments: Micro-procrastination, cognitive load, and deep work across educational levels. Journal of Research, Innovation, and Strategies for Education (RISE), 3(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.v3i4.1

Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the Internet. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5, 239–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00005-1

Billion, M., Crespo, J., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2021). Do educational inequalities affect Internet use? An analysis for developed and developing countries. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101521

Chen, C., & Phanumartwiwath, A. (2025). Bridging the gray digital divide: A cross-cultural qualitative study on digital inclusion and healthy aging in Germany, Japan, and Thailand. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100218

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book235675

Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., García Marquéz, J. R., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/discovering-statistics-using-ibm-spss-statistics/book235999

Guo, C., & Wan, B. (2022). The digital divide in online learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 71, 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102122

Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/145575

Hilbert, M. (2016). The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommunications Policy, 40(6), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006

Heaton, J. (2008). Secondary analysis of qualitative data: An overview. Historical Social Research, 33(3), 33–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20762299

International Telecommunication Union. (2023a). ICT Development Index 2023. https://www.itu.int

International Telecommunication Union. (2023b). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2023. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx

Jafar, K., Ananthpur, K., & Venkatachalam, L. (2023). Digital divide and access to online education: New evidence from Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 25, 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00236-1

Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626. http://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169

Kawaii, D. (2023, March 7). Overcoming Japan’s uphill battle toward digital transformation. National Bureau of Asian Research. https://www.nbr.org/publication/overcoming-japans-uphill-battle-toward-digital-transformation/

Kim, J. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087

Lee, H., & Lee, R. (2024). Transformation of Korean higher education in the digital era: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(2), 47–55. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427546.pdf

Li, M. (2025). Exploring the digital divide in primary education: A comparative study of urban and rural mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes towards technology integration in post-pandemic China. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1913–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12890-x

Lim, K., Kim, Y., Kim, M., Jang, Y., & Joo, M. (2019). The digital divide? Analyzing regional differences of tablet PC use in Korean middle schools for sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(18), 5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185054

Lim, S. S., & Suhaila, Z. S. (2022). Bridging Singapore’s digital divides: Making our Smart Nation smarter. In I. A. Mokhtar & Y. Ibrahim (Eds.), Social context, policies and changes in Singapore: Beyond the first 50 years. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33371.13609

Mirazchiyski, P. V. (2025). Contemporary gaps in research on digital divide in education: A literature review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01166-3

Nguyen, T. Q., Ngoc, P. T. A., Phuong, H. A., Duy, D. P. T., Hiep, P. C., McClelland, R., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Digital competence of Vietnamese citizens: An application of DigComp framework and the role of individual factors. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19267–19298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12585-3

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) database. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/

Puspitasari, L., & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.001

Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23

Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2015). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540006

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report

Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=the-digital-divide--9781509534450

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. https://data.worldbank.org